-
Hi guys, thank you so much for joining
-
us today. We're talking about the
-
ketamine debate for status epilepticus.
-
Here with me are Gabe, Renaud, and
-
Caroline, and I'm Sally Furrok. I'm
-
excited to ask some questions. We're
-
gonna start with Gabe. Hi, Gabe. How
-
are you doing? Oh, well, after that
-
trouncing of a loss, a full 17 voted
-
for me. I'm a little hurt right now,
-
but I think I can power through it.
-
Okay So your side of the debate was that
-
do not use ketamine, and that was
-
epileptic, is correct. Okay. That was
-
my side, yes. Okay. So I am gonna
-
kind of flip and switch kind of roles
-
here and ask. I know that you had a
-
very good conversation and actually a
-
very strong, I think,
-
story about why we shouldn't use
-
ketamine. But if you had this very
-
specific patient population that you
-
would identify could possibly benefit
-
very much so from ketamine and status,
-
how would you describe that group? What
-
is that kind of very clear patient
-
population that you would think, you
-
know what, this is it. This is like a
-
perfect patient for ketamine, and I'm
-
just gonna use it despite the shortage.
-
Yeah, no, it's an excellent question.
-
And I think there are sort of three time
-
points in the treatment of status-up
-
rectus where I really consider the use
-
of ketamine. I think in the majority of
-
patients, if they're moving towards
-
intubation, pairing it with another
-
anesthetic like propofol, for instance,
-
and using both as part of that
-
peri-intubation phase, and there's very
-
little of any evidence to support that,
-
but I do think really early ketamine may
-
help mitigate some of the longer-term
-
status epilepticus. I think the other
-
patient where I consider it early are
-
those patients who are human dynamically
-
unstable. Despite describing
-
cardiovascular collapse, Caroline did
-
an excellent job showing that phenomenon
-
is really in patients receiving
-
conventional anesthetics like medazoleum
-
and propofol along with ketamine. So
-
it's nearly impossible to discern which
-
of these is contributing to that. It's
-
good to be mindful of it, but in those
-
patients who are human dynamically
-
unstable, I think putting them on
-
ketamine or adding ketamine to their
-
current profile in Caroline and her
-
colleagues showed that their mean
-
arterial pressure will increase over
-
time over the course of five to seven
-
days and their presser requirements will
-
decrease later on Since that is
-
epilepticus, those patients who you
-
presume or have diagnosed press, that
-
is a patient that I'm trying to get off
-
propofol almost immediately and rapidly
-
up titrate ketamine if they're not
-
already on it. And so I think those are
-
three of the areas where I'd really
-
consider ketamine. Okay, great.
-
Caroline, your turn. So you were
-
talking about how ketamine is amazing
-
and is the magic bullet and everyone
-
should be on it. But I want to flip
-
roles here and ask, is there a specific
-
patient population that if this happen
-
on rounds, you're going to say,
-
absolutely not. This patient will not
-
benefit from ketamine. If anything,
-
they may actually, um, this may harm
-
them. They may, um, you know, have
-
some really, like significant
-
complications from ketamine. The one
-
patient population that I can think of
-
is patients who are already having like
-
hypercloemic metabolic acidosis, and
-
they're like in shock. I think in that
-
patient population, I would be careful
-
starting ketamine. I would recommend
-
not starting it because of like the
-
genuine that is in like hydrochloride,
-
then you can potentially worsen these
-
patients metabolic acidosis. So I think
-
in that patient population, from the
-
side effect perspective, I would
-
recommend not choosing ketamine. Would
-
you be okay if your team said, well,
-
we're just going to bolus, but, you
-
know, very concentrated. Is that just
-
the metabolic part of it with the
-
dilution? Or do you think that the drug
-
itself, let's say, if we're just using
-
the high, you know, concentration
-
boluses? Whether you're using like
-
diluted or on diluted, I think you're
-
going to have run into this problem.
-
Because the diluted one is second. 9
-
sodium chloride is a high chloride load
-
on diluted one is like hydrochloride is
-
a genuine so you're going to also have
-
like your like your hyperfluoramic load.
-
So I think like either or you're going
-
to end up facing that and I've seen
-
cases of like severe cardiovascular
-
collapse with high doses of melanoma and
-
ketamine where they are having like this
-
very high hyperfluoramic metabolic
-
acidosis. So in these situations, I'd
-
rather like just down titrate
-
anesthetics as soon as possible to
-
prevent the cardiovascular collapse.
-
Okay, cool. All right, we're not. I
-
have a question for you that I think was
-
also asked after the talk but I'm so
-
interested to know what you think about
-
this. There's this whole notion of
-
early and super early and I think that
-
Gabe and Carolyn kind of talked about oh
-
maybe it's you know after the first
-
agent were really rushing to use
-
ketamine as before even like other
-
anesthetics or you started before your
-
first anesthetic.
-
But I have a hard time mechanistically
-
thinking about early and super early
-
meaning, you know, this whole receptor
-
down regulation, up regulations,
-
probably already started, right? So
-
even if we talk about after how many
-
medications in that sequence of okay,
-
like after your first benzod, that's
-
the time, or even during the time that
-
you're bolising your medaz, you should
-
bolise your ketamine. Is that really
-
still early? Like what is the timeline
-
that we're looking at? I know in the
-
pediatrician study that you mentioned,
-
you said three days was in one of the
-
studies, like that was kind of early,
-
and then after that, it was considered
-
late. So I feel like there's a huge
-
discrepancy, and I feel like I still
-
really don't understand if even like we
-
should talk about hours, minutes, or
-
we should talk about, oh, it's
-
probably already too late, by the time
-
that we diagnose the patient, right?
-
What do you think about that? What's
-
your kind of assessment and experience?
-
So I think your question has a couple of
-
different parts. I think the first
-
thing I would address is while we talked
-
about the receptor traffic king
-
hypothesis and Caroline did a wonderful
-
job talking about that, there's another
-
hypothesis most of us know about, but
-
we don't really, I don't think we talk
-
about a lot. And that's 80 to 90 of the
-
receptors in the brain are actually
-
excitatory. And so when you think of
-
SaaS, I've looked at this in the
-
glutamate overload, it makes sense even
-
early on to target that receptor group
-
with medications. And so from that
-
perspective, mechanically it makes
-
sense to start ketamine. I wouldn't go
-
as far as to say, start it instead of a
-
benzo because that is our standard of
-
care. But again, it's thinking about,
-
okay, well, we use other ASMs that
-
target glutamate and glutamate receptors
-
and excitatory receptors second with
-
non-benzo ASMs like Fennetown. Why not?
-
Is that something that we need to think
-
about? And there actually are centers I
-
think that there's one in Italy where.
-
there's talk about using ketamine
-
boluses
-
kind of after that initial load of a
-
benzoyl or right after the first line
-
non-benzo ASM
-
as a bolus. And again, is that
-
considered early? Is like you mentioned,
-
is using ketamine as an infusion as your
-
first anesthetic? Is that considered
-
early? I think it's really more of a
-
discussion of, at least in my
-
experience, what clinicians are
-
comfortable with, right? And so if you
-
have clinicians that are maybe not
-
comfortable using ketamine in general,
-
it might be a bit of a stretch to
-
suggest that we do a bolus, right?
-
Instead of or right after the first
-
non-benzo ASM.
-
But that is something that in my
-
experience, I've done a couple of times
-
when I can when I can get the kind of go
-
to to do that and it, you know, in our
-
population. we are trying to,
-
you know, mitigate the potential for
-
intubation, I think it would be helpful.
-
But even starting it as your first
-
anesthetic, I mean, at that point,
-
you know, the consistent thing that we
-
see in the literature is that treatment
-
delays are there, right? Regardless of
-
whether you're talking about the first
-
non-benzo ASM or the first anesthetic.
-
And we, it's interesting because we all
-
know that treatment delay is one of the
-
independent factors that leads to poor
-
outcomes, whether in pizza or adults.
-
So why aren't we treating patients in
-
general more aggressively? Whether that
-
includes ketamine or not, I think is a
-
discussion. But to be honest, I don't
-
think the debate should be whether or
-
not ketamine is considered a valid
-
option in these patients. I think
-
really what we need to study and what we
-
need to figure out is when and how are
-
we going to use it. That's the area
-
that I would like to see more literature.
-
Great, cool. Thank you guys. With
-
that, we're ending our session today
-
that you enjoy the rest of the meeting.
-
Thank you.