-
All right. Hi, everyone. Welcome back.
-
This is the Insights podcast. As you
-
remember, Insights is based on the
-
incredible content that's on on call,
-
which is a continually updated online
-
chapter textbook that is published by
-
the Neurocritical Care Society. And
-
today I'm back with Stalia. We have a
-
really exciting episode because several
-
actinoid is a and exciting topic, but
-
also there are two new guidelines to
-
inform this updated content. And we're
-
really excited to dive right back in.
-
But before we get started, a couple
-
words from our sponsor, Biogen and
-
Sarah Bell, and now a word from one of
-
the sponsors. Founded in 1978, Biogen
-
is a leading global biotechnology
-
company that has pioneered multiple
-
breakthrough innovations, including a
-
broad portfolio of medicines to treat
-
multiple sclerosis the first approved
-
treatment for spinal muscular atrophy
-
and to co-developed treatments to
-
address a defining pathology of
-
Alzheimer's disease. Biogen is
-
advancing a pipeline of potential novel
-
therapies across neurology,
-
neuropsychiatry, specialized immunology,
-
and rare diseases, and remains acutely
-
focused on its purpose of serving
-
humanity through science while advancing
-
a healthier, more sustainable, and
-
equitable world. All right, so just
-
like I said in the intro, this has been
-
really exciting because there's not one.
-
There are two recently updated
-
guidelines. One has been put forth by
-
the Neurocritical Care Society, and
-
then one is by the American Heart
-
Association, the American Stroke
-
Association, and now the on-call
-
chapter reflects these updated
-
management paradigms. And so, this has
-
been a really exciting content update.
-
The last time we had had really a whole
-
new set of guidelines had been over 12
-
years ago So this is fresh management.
-
Awesome, yeah, hi everyone. Thank you,
-
Casey. It's good to be back. As you
-
said, this is really exciting. It's
-
exciting enough that we're gonna do two
-
different episodes on it. The first one
-
will really focus on what we're gonna do
-
in the acute phase and just stabilizing
-
these patients. Let's say you got them
-
in the ED, just the initial assessment,
-
initial management. And then the second
-
episode that we're gonna do together
-
also is gonna focus on okay, now these
-
patients are diagnosed and they're gonna
-
have some complications and how do we go
-
about those complications and management
-
of those complications.
-
So,
-
Casey, let's say you get a call to go
-
see someone in the ED, when do you
-
actually think about sub-acronin
-
hemorrhage? How do you assess these
-
patients and when does that seem to be
-
your initial first thought for
-
diagnosing these patients? Absolutely.
-
So one of, I think, the hallmark trait
-
of these patients is that these are
-
patients who present with the worst
-
headache of life, classically. Now it
-
is really important to remember that
-
sub-arachnoid hemorrhage is not the only
-
thing that causes an abrupt onset
-
headache. You also have to consider,
-
is this reversible vasoconstriction
-
syndrome? Is this meningitis? Is this
-
pituitary apple plexi? Even into
-
prancomol hemorrhage can cause that
-
terrible onset headache. So when I hear
-
someone say, you know, this was a
-
person who came in worst headache of
-
life, then of course, my suspicion is,
-
you know, to rule out subarachnoid
-
hemorrhage. And what I think the
-
guidelines have made really clear is
-
that our threshold for scanning people
-
with new onset worst headache of life
-
should be very low. The American Stroke
-
Association guidelines talk about the
-
Ottawa imaging rule for subarachnoid
-
hemorrhage. Going through the details
-
of that is really not important. Others
-
didn't just say that it's very sensitive.
-
Basically, anyone who's coming in with
-
a thunderclap headache needs imaging
-
with a non-con heads ET to evaluate for
-
whether or not they've had a
-
subarachnoid hemorrhage.
-
The CT scan, good, you know, up to
-
date CT scanners are very, very
-
sensitive at picking up acute blood.
-
The acute or the blood, the more
-
sensitive they are. As time goes on,
-
the sensitivity of a CT scan diminishes.
-
And so one of the things that I think is
-
very interesting in this guideline is
-
they talk about sort of the six-hour
-
divide between the patients who come in
-
within six hours of the ixis of headache
-
and those who come in after six hours.
-
For the patients who come in within six
-
hours, if there is no sign of
-
subarachinoid hemorrhage on a CT scan
-
that's on a high-quality scanner, the
-
scan is read by a neuroradiology trained
-
radiologist, then that's it. You're
-
done The patient doesn't have
-
subarachinoid hemorrhage.
-
It gets a little trickier if they are
-
coming in. after six hours of the ictus
-
of headache. At the after six hour mark,
-
that's CT scan if there's any equipos
-
and clinically you have a high concern
-
because the patient says, you know,
-
I'm really having a bad headache. It
-
came on all of a sudden, it was worse
-
right when it started. And
-
unfortunately, you really do need to do
-
a lumbar puncture to rule out the other
-
chromium. Now, one of the things that
-
I think we were hoping maybe we could
-
get away with is MRI. And one of the
-
things to make clear is that the ASA
-
guidelines say there is not enough data
-
on the use of MRI in these patients. So
-
we cannot rely on an MRI to be the next
-
step in our diagnostic algorithm for
-
subarachine hemorrhage. You have
-
clinical concerns. It's been more than
-
six hours. There's equipose on
-
the CT scan. That patient needs a
-
lumbar puncture.
-
When you find subarachnoid hemorrhage on
-
the CT scan, it's first of all really
-
important to look at the pattern of
-
subarachnoid hemorrhage. I think we're
-
all trained to be focused on
-
subarachnoid hemorrhage, it means that
-
there's an aneurysm and aneurysm has
-
ruptured. That pattern of blood is
-
usually blood within the basal cisterns,
-
kind of at the base of the brain, which
-
is where the circle of willis is So when
-
these aneurysm ruptures, they put blood
-
into the circle of willis, into the
-
ventricle space, that's sort of the
-
classic pattern. Chortical subarachnoid
-
hemorrhage actually has a different
-
differential diagnosis. We're not going
-
to talk about that during this, but it
-
is kind of important if you're trying to
-
tease out, you know, is this an
-
aneurysm rupture patient that you're
-
looking for sort of the classic aneurysm
-
rupture pattern, or sometimes blood in
-
the solvian and Fisher, which can be
-
sort of an atypical pattern. All right.
-
All right, but let's say this is a
-
patient, they come in, it's within six
-
hours. They've got blood in the bit and
-
the basal cisterns. This looks
-
extremely concerning for an aneurysmal
-
subarachnoid hemorrhage. Really,
-
really important to get the patient to a
-
high volume center. We know that
-
dedicated neurocritical care and
-
neurovascular surgical expertise make a
-
big difference in these patients So the
-
first step, if you're not sort of at a
-
high volume subarachnoid hemorrhage
-
center, is getting the patient to one
-
of those centers. And then we're also
-
thinking through kind of the top three
-
things that can make these patients
-
worse acutely. So they absolutely need
-
their aneurysm treated as soon as
-
possible to prevent one of the worst
-
complications, which is re-repture.
-
They also really need early treatment,
-
or even sometimes prevention of
-
hydrocephalus. Remember that when blood
-
from an aneurysm ruptures, it's
-
rupturing into the CSF space. It's
-
causing that CSF to not circulate in the
-
way that it normally would. And that
-
leads to the development of
-
hydrocephalus. This is what can really
-
kill people. If they don't die from the
-
aneurysm rupture, they can die because
-
of hydrocephalus. And that is a
-
completely treatable etiology. So we
-
need to get them to a place where a
-
neurosurgeon can put in an external
-
ventricular drain or a lumbar drain,
-
depending on how your center manages
-
these patients. I think there's still
-
some equipos there about which way is
-
better. Either way, they're going to
-
need CSF diversion. And then we have to
-
think about, well, what are some of
-
the things that can make re-repture more
-
likely, and how do we prevent those
-
things? And the two things that come to
-
my mind are seizures We know that
-
patients who see me. They're at higher
-
risk of causing intracranial pressure.
-
They can have pressure gradient changes
-
that can cause the aneurysms to re
-
rupture. And we know that ongoing and
-
sustained hypertension also is probably
-
setting the patient up to have a
-
complication. Now the guidelines are
-
clear and Sally, I really want to ask
-
you, how are you thinking through what
-
drugs to give when you think about
-
hypertension and seizure prevention in
-
this acute setting? Yeah, absolutely I
-
think starting with blood pressure
-
management, the first thing that
-
there's a lot of debate about it, and
-
sometimes I think honestly, it's a
-
blessing that we don't have a specific
-
blood pressure goal, which makes you
-
think that every patient requires that
-
kind of individualized blood pressure
-
goal. So when we think about these
-
patients, I think the first question
-
that comes up is that is the aneurysm
-
secured or not secured, because that
-
alone can play a huge role for the blood
-
pressure goal that you have You know,
-
the patients that they don't have the
-
aneurysm. secured yet. The problem is
-
that you are always afraid that if your
-
blood pressure is even slightly high,
-
you're going to rupture that. So
-
usually those patients have a more tight
-
blood pressure control goal. Every
-
institution, I'm sure, is different.
-
Sometimes you talk about less than 140.
-
Sometimes you talk about less than 120.
-
But again, it's just important to note
-
that these patients require a lower
-
blood pressure goal. But then on the
-
flip side, if you have a patient that
-
requires more perfusion because they're
-
at risk of infarction, those patients
-
require augmentation of blood pressure.
-
Obviously at this point, aneurysms are
-
secured and it's a little bit down the
-
road when we talk about that.
-
As far as what agents to use, I think
-
we've had this discussion in other
-
episodes that you want something that is
-
quick on, something that is easy to
-
titrate. Agents that come into play are
-
nichardopene.
-
I would highly recommend that people
-
stay away from long acting or agents
-
that are not easy to titrate. Even some
-
IV agents, you know, like libetalol,
-
it's not easy to titrate IV hydrolysine.
-
You could potentially get away with like
-
one or two doses initially before your
-
infusion is there, but it's not really
-
your ultimate blood pressure medication
-
to use And lastly, I think when it
-
comes to blood pressure, you know, the
-
guidelines really focused on minimizing
-
blood pressure variability. So more
-
than really what goal to target, just
-
avoiding these fluctuations is our
-
ultimate goal with the idea that every
-
patient should have their own specific
-
individualized goal
-
As far as anti-seizure medications for
-
seizure perphylaxis, I think previously,
-
a lot of people focused on seven days
-
for seizure perphylaxis or maybe until
-
your aneurysm is secured. But then
-
there was more evidence after that kind
-
of statement that we don't really have
-
enough information or evidence to back
-
that up So maybe that was just something
-
that was recommended without much
-
evidence behind it. The new guidelines,
-
I think, really are focusing on who is
-
at risk and targeting those patients.
-
And I really like how they specifically
-
said, you know, patients who have MCA
-
aneurysm patients who have high grade
-
and yours most of our hemorrhage,
-
meaning hunting has a gradient in three
-
or fissure, a gradient in three or four,
-
people at cortical infarction, people
-
at hydrocephalus, just like you
-
mentioned, that they're at high risk of
-
just worse outcomes in general. Maybe
-
those patients should receive it.
-
They do talk about the fact that we
-
don't know what agent to use, but stay
-
away from fenetoyne because we know that
-
fenetoyne is associated with worse
-
outcomes. Another additional purl is
-
that fenetoyne will interact with
-
namotapine and it will drop the
-
concentration of namotapine, which you
-
do not want that. So there's a lot of
-
reasons really not to do fenetoyne
-
Love-a-tracetam is a good option. If
-
you don't want to do that, I think
-
lecosamide could be another good
-
alternative, which is a newer drug, a
-
minimized drug-drug interactions and
-
things like that. And then there's
-
always this question of, okay, I have
-
this really high-risk patient with
-
hydrocephalus, you know, hunting has
-
to bore. How long should I keep this
-
anti-seizure medication for prophylaxis?
-
The real answer is that we don't know,
-
but the guidelines say that, you know,
-
They kind of talked about studies
-
looking at. three days or less, and
-
three days and more, and guess what?
-
The outcomes for preventing seizures in
-
the hospital was the same, but people
-
who received it for a longer duration
-
actually had worse clinical outcomes at
-
the end in long term. So I think
-
there's still probably
-
more, I don't
-
want to say evidence, but probably it
-
looks like it's more favorable to use
-
the shorter duration of seizure
-
prophylaxis, but the actual true
-
duration of seizure prophylaxis is not
-
exactly or 100 known
-
Absolutely, so just to emphasize, we
-
don't have an exact target for blood
-
pressure. We want smooth lowering of
-
the blood pressure in our patients who
-
are not secured. Using those titratable
-
agents, again, we know hypotension is
-
bad for our patients. And then there's
-
still a lot of equipos about how long to
-
treat with seizures, but certainly
-
avoiding Benitoin and then trying to get
-
away with the least amount of seizure
-
medication possible I think what I
-
really liked about these guidelines is
-
that they really try to emphasize, look
-
at the patient in front of you. The
-
grade one subarach probably does not
-
need to be on a whole week of seizure
-
prophylaxis. However, the high grade
-
patient who you don't have a great exam
-
for and you're maybe seeing that they've
-
got some IIC variability, they're being
-
monitored, that patient maybe is a
-
totally different patient than the low
-
grade subarach The other thing that was
-
different from these guidelines T-X-A.
-
So Salia, walk us through, like what
-
happened with T-X-A?
-
Absolutely. As I said, this is a
-
change. So previously, I think there
-
was a lot of maybe interest and
-
guidelines made it sound like previous
-
guidelines, made it sound like it's
-
reasonable to give T-X-A, you know, to
-
prevent re-bleeding, especially if
-
you're going to be an institution that
-
you can't treat that, you know, and
-
you're as small as they age immediately
-
And I think one trial came out that made
-
this really
-
made this new recommendation. And then
-
even after the guidelines got published,
-
there is another study that was
-
published in Brazil that I'm going to
-
talk about that. Also, I think make
-
things even easier to and more clear to
-
understand. So the ultra trial came out
-
and they showed that if you actually
-
treated that aneurysm with an average
-
time of 14 hours, giving
-
anti-pharmalytic such as TXA did not
-
help with outcomes. But then they kind
-
of put it out there that, okay, like
-
if you're in an institution that you
-
can't act on it immediately, meaning
-
you can't treat this aneurysm
-
immediately, maybe there's a role. But
-
then may of this year in Brazil, there
-
was a study that was published and they
-
showed that even in centers that they're
-
not treating their aneurysms quickly, I
-
think the average time for, you know,
-
neuroi or procedures is about three to
-
four days, which is pretty late. They
-
also not only showed that this was not
-
better, there was higher mortality with
-
TxA. So I think right now the new
-
guidelines are saying, we do not
-
recommend this. So I think TxA is out.
-
So I think that's just something that is
-
different. And obviously it's not
-
benign, there's just a sort of
-
thrombosis, there's all these other
-
conditions that can happen with Tx and
-
other agents in that category, in that
-
class, which is, I mean, a cup of
-
garlic acid.
-
just reinforcing the guideline
-
recommendation that
-
there is no real benefit for giving
-
these agents. I love that. We're just
-
moving towards being like, is
-
intensivist. So I think we've kind of
-
covered everything. I mean, really
-
when a patient comes in, you have a
-
high level of suspicion where it's
-
headache of life, needs a head CT. It
-
can be pretty confident within six hours
-
of ICTIS that if the head CT is negative
-
and you have a good scanner and a
-
neuro-radiology reading it, you're good.
-
Otherwise, you need to go down a
-
diagnostic algorithm to make sure you're
-
not missing it and that really does
-
include the LP. We're thinking about
-
treatment of, or first of all, triage
-
to an appropriate center and really
-
using medication wisely to prevent re -
-
rupture to treat and prophylaxis against
-
seizures and then to get somewhere to a
-
place where they can get an EVD, but
-
TXA, not so much part of the guidelines.
-
This is a really, really fun part one.
-
And then I hope you'll stick around. In
-
the next episode, we're gonna cover
-
sort of what do you do in these very
-
complicated and super interesting
-
patients land in the neuro ICU? Saw you
-
any last words? No, I think you
-
covered it all. We'll see you in the
-
next episode. All right,
-
bye.